(London, UK) The European Repo and Collateral Council of the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) has released the results of its 32nd semi-annual survey of the European repo market. The survey, which calculates the amount of repo business outstanding on 7 December 2016 from the returns of 65 offices of 62 financial groups, sets the baseline figure for market size at EUR 5,656 billion.
Using a consistent sample of banks that have contributed to the last 3 surveys, the market shows 0.8% year on year growth and 2.4% growth from the June 2016 survey. The size of the repo market remains static, with some seasonal fluctuations. Negligible real growth in the repo market, the mechanism by which collateral is moved around the financial system, at a time when demand for collateral is increasing is indicative of a market under stress.
The results of the 32nd survey point to increasing demand for collateral in the form of High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA):
The repo market at year-end 2016
A further detailed study of conditions in the euro repo market at year end 2016 shows that market participants experienced extreme volatility and market dislocation as they tried to meet their needs for collateral in the form of HQLA to meet regulatory requirements. The study, produced by Andy Hill on behalf of the ICMA ERCC, is based on market data and interviews with repo market-makers, buy-side firms, and infrastructure providers.
It supports the view that the year-end break-down was the result of a perfect storm driven by heightened demand for high quality liquid assets, the ECB’s quantitative easing program, and further regulatory pressure on banks’ balance sheets resulting in scarcity of HQLA.
Godfried De Vidts, Chairman of ICMA’s ERCC said: ‘The 2016 year-end was the first real test for the market since the Lehman default and sovereign bond crisis (when the market functioned relatively effectively). If the extreme volatility and dislocations witnessed at the end of December are an indication of future market resilience, we should be concerned. Market behaviour since the year-end, and forward pricing pressures for the March quarter-end, would seem to suggest that we may be entering a new normal for the repo market. Turbulence in the repo market will ultimately be felt most by the pension funds, insurance companies and asset managers to whom citizens entrust their money. Since demand for HQLA, quantitative easing, and pressures on banks’ balance sheets are only set to increase, careful fine-tuning of some of the technical measures put in place by regulatory reforms, already being considered by the authorities, is fully justified.”