Finadium
0
Product was successfully added to your cart
  • Finadium
  • SFM Home
  • About SFM
  • Events
  • Webinars & Podcasts
  • SFM Magazine
  • Fintech Capital Markets
  • Login
  • SUBSCRIBE RSS
​

McKinsey says banks will cut $1.2 billion in research spending with MiFID II, a 30% drop

June 22, 2017Josh Galper

From Bloomberg:

Europe’s impending ban on free research will cost hundreds of analysts their jobs with banks set to cut about $1.2 billion of investment on the area, according to a report by McKinsey & Co.

The consultancy estimates the $4 billion that the top-10 sell-side banks currently spend on research annually is likely to fall by 30 percent as clients become pickier about what they pay for, McKinsey Partner Roger Rudisuli said in an interview. Investment banks’ cash equity research headcount has fallen 12 percent to 3,900 since 2011 compared with as much as 40 percent in sales and trading, leaving the area facing “big cuts” to catch up, he said.

From McKinsey, with a form to request access to the report:

The traditional business of providing equity research to asset managers has been under pressure in recent years. Nonetheless, equity research still offers an attractive business opportunity for banks and broker-dealers that can adapt to deliver the types of research the buy side values and successfully transform their operating models.

Providing research ideas to long-only managers and hedge funds as a companion to execution services has been at the core of banks’ equity operations for decades. Imminent MiFID II regulation requires that research be distinct from trading, and that each be paid for separately. Some observers propose that these combined forces will render the business unprofitable and bring about the end of broker research.

McKinsey’s view is that there will be an end only to equity research as we know it. In five years’ time, sell-side equity research will likely still play a crucial role in the fundamental investment processes of the buy side, but most firms’ research functions will be smaller and more focused, governed by a strategic appreciation of the buy side’s need to produce alpha. The ultimate size of each bank’s research revenue pool, however, will be determined by its ability to efficiently deliver quality, differentiated research, set realistic prices, and control distribution, all through a very different operating model.

Related Posts

  • MP: UK will fare best by embracing MiFID II post-Brexit
    September 21, 2016
  • ESMA clarifies calculations for MiFID II non-equity instruments
    July 5, 2017
  • Greenwich: asset managers expect to follow MiFID II rules globally
    March 15, 2017
Previous post ECB working paper: The leverage ratio, risk-taking and bank stability Next post Fed blog: Low Interest Rates and Bank Profits

Click here to cancel reply.

SUBSCRIBE or Register for Free Access
  • Subscribe for access
  • Register for free to view non-premium content

Member Login

Forgot Password?
Create an Account
  • About Us
© 2018 Securities Finance Monitor. All Rights Reserved.
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
All Articles
News and Notes
Basel III
CCP
Collateral Management
Derivatives
Featured
Liquidity Management
Regulatory
Repo
Securities Lending
Shadow Banking