BIS: Model risk at central counterparties: Is skin-in-the-game a game changer?

We investigate how central counterparties (CCPs) manage counterparty credit risks. CCPs play a key role in clearing derivative trades. They stand between clearing members, insuring them against counterparty credit risks. To manage these risks, CCPs ask their clearing members for collateral, ie initial margin. Model risk arises when a CCP underestimates potential credit losses in its initial margin model. If model risk were to materialise at a time of stress, it could lead to the CCP’s failure – with systemic consequences.

Our contribution is to examine how CCPs might be incentivised to set the initial margin correctly. Incentives matter, because setting the initial margin requires CCPs to make expert judgments. Other parties, such as regulators, lack the information to set them efficiently. We examine three factors that might influence incentives: (i) skin-in-the-game, ie a CCP’s own capital, which can be used to cover credit losses; (ii) profits as a proxy for franchise value; and (iii) capital other than skin-in-the-game. We ask how these variables relate to five proxies for model risk: (1) number of margin breaches; (2) achieved coverage; (3) difference between achieved and target coverage; (4) average size of margin breaches; and (5) maximum size of margin breaches.

We find that a higher amount of skin-in-the-game is associated with a lower degree of model risk. We do not find any similar association between model risk and profits or capital other than skin-in-the-game. The results are robust for all five proxies of model risk.

PDF full text

Related Posts

Previous Post
SocGen and Banque de France test €40 million tokenized issuance
Next Post
Starts and stops for Chinese bonds as global collateral (Premium)

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.


Reset password

Create an account