Why is the NSFR so negative on CCPs, after everything else regulators have done to drive business in that direction? (Premium)

Basel III’s Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) presents an odd dilemma in its negative treatment of CCP exposures. After regulators have piled support onto CCPs at all instances, why would this situation exist? Its almost as if the Basel Committee went out to lunch and another team entirely wrote the NSFR’s CCP rules.
This content requires free registration (unlocked content) or a Finadium subscription. Log in or get access today by signing up here.

Related Posts

Previous Post
ICE Benchmark Administration launched crowdsourcing facility for ISDA SIMM(TM)
Next Post
AFME releases Principles on Asset Segregation Due Diligence and Collateral Management

Related Posts

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.


Reset password

Create an account