Would ring fencing under Glass Steagall have prevented the 2008 MBS collapse? (Premium)

Last month the Washington Post looked into the contention of the Sanders campaign that Glass Steagall would have prevented commercial banks from crossing the line into the shadow banking realm, and potentially prevented the 2008 economic crisis. The Post article makes a strong case that not only is this not true, but the protective provisions of Glass Steagall were fundamentally irrelevant. What’s the story here?

Please to view this content. (Not a member? Subscribe Today!)

Related Posts

Previous Post
ESMA consults on benchmark regulation
Next Post
Holding steady in a 'hurry up and wait' environment – an interview with Clearstream (Premium)

Related Posts

You do not have permission to view the comments.

Please Login to post a comment

Menu
X

Reset password

Create an account