Veracode: open source accounts for 82% of critical security debt at financial firms

Veracode analysis shows that nearly two-thirds (63%) of banking, financial services, and insurance (BFSI) organizations harbor critical security debt — high-severity flaws left unfixed for longer than a year — a rate of 13% points higher than the cross-industry average, according to the application risk management platform provider’s 2025 State of Software Security (SoSS) Snapshot for the Financial Services Sector.

Veracode researchers report 77% of financial services organizations accrue some level of security debt. With an average flaw half-life of 276 days — the time it takes to remediate 50% of all vulnerabilities — it takes the sector nearly a month longer to fix security issues than other industries. Despite modest gains in reducing high-severity flaws, progress has stalled as older, larger applications in the sector continue to accumulate unresolved security risks.

“Our data reveals a silent, growing risk for the sector created by unresolved security debt,” said Chris Wysopal, co-founder at Veracode. “With AI-driven attacks surging and compliance requirements tightening, finance leaders must prioritize strategic risk reduction, starting with targeted remediation of critical software flaws.”

Source: Veracode

Open source dependency amplifies exposure

The report found the supply chain remains a major source of risk. While third-party code represents just 17% of total security debt, it accounts for more than 82% of critical security debt at financial firms. With open-source flaws requiring 50% more time to remediate than first-party code, organizations face mounting exposure amid escalating regulatory pressure. Proactively assessing open-source libraries and avoiding components with known flaws significantly reduces long-term exposure and risk across applications.

The report also benchmarks top-performing BFSI enterprises against lower-performing organizations. Industry leaders remediate over 9% of open flaws monthly and limit security debt to less than 26% of applications, while laggards have debt in 85% or more of their applications and stretch fix cycles beyond a year. The gap underscores the importance of continuous code analysis, rapid remediation, and contextual risk-based prioritization with modern, AI-powered tools.

Read the full report

Related Posts

Previous Post
TD Securities: stablecoins to become material investors in Treasury bill and repo markets
Next Post
Securitize and Cantor SPAC to go public at $1.25bn valuation

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

X

Reset password

Create an account