IOSCO consults on ESG Ratings and Data Providers

The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) is soliciting feedback on a set of proposed recommendations regarding Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Ratings and Data Providers.

The IOSCO Consultation Report on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Ratings and Data Providers (Consultation Report) aims at assisting IOSCO members in understanding the implications of the activities of ESG ratings and data providers and in establishing frameworks to mitigate risks stemming from these activities. In doing so, it proposes a set of recommendations to mitigate these risks and address some of the challenges faced by users of products and services from ESG ratings and data providers, and the companies that are the subject of these ESG ratings and data products.

To inform its work, IOSCO undertook a fact-finding exercise that revealed, amongst other risks and challenges, a lack of transparency about the methodologies underpinning ratings or data products and an often uneven coverage of products offered across industries and geographical areas. IOSCO has observed that this could lead to gaps and inconsistencies when applied to investment strategies and raise concerns around the management of potential conflicts of interest, such as fee structures and insufficient separation of business lines that provide advisory services to issuers to improve their ratings performance.

The market for ESG ratings and data has grown considerably over the past few years due inter alia to a lack of consistent information disclosures at the entity level, the increasing interest of investors in ESG products and the legislative and regulatory focus on financial market participants’ consideration of the ESG characteristics of potential investments.

This market, however, currently does not fall within the typical remit of securities regulators, hence leading IOSCO to propose key considerations for securities regulators in this area.

The Consultation Report is an additional piece to the overall framework for sustainability that IOSCO is developing in close coordination with its members and other international organizations. The Report on Sustainability-related Issuer Disclosures,  published in June, addresses data gaps at the corporate level.  The report on Recommendations on Sustainability-Related Practices, Policies, Procedures and Disclosure in Asset Management, also issued in June, focusses on the activities of asset managers as an important agency-model business that channels investor capital into sustainable finance.  It underscores the importance of ESG ratings and data products in the decisions made by these asset managers.

Ashley Alder, IOSCO Chair and Chief Executive Officer of the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong, said: “The use of ESG rating and data products is on the rise but most jurisdictions do not have regulatory frameworks which explicitly cover the providers of these products. Users have signalled that having multiple ESG ratings and data products can cause confusion, raising serious questions about relevance, reliability and greenwashing. The recommendations made in this report are part of our efforts to address the challenges and risks faced by ESG ratings and data providers as well as by the users of these ratings and data products and the companies which are subject to them.”

Erik Thedéen, Chair of the IOSCO Sustainable Finance Task Force and Director General of Finansinspektionen of Sweden, said: “We have sought to understand all facets of the challenges and risks that may arise with regards to the use of ESG ratings and data products. This complements our efforts on addressing the lack of reliability and comparability of data at the corporate level and the recommendations we have set out for asset management activities in the field of sustainability. The proposed recommendations comprise a breadth of topics such as improving the reliability, comparability, and interpretability of ESG ratings and data products, transparency of methodology, managing conflicts of interest and the interactions with companies’ subject to ESG ratings or data products.”

Comments may be submitted on or before 6 September 2021

Related Posts

Previous Post
Acuiti: the impact of SA-CCR on bank capital requirements
Next Post
Financial Bite: Can Tether Reach Mainstream?

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.


Reset password

Create an account