Science weighs in on Basel III: researchers favor a risk-based transaction tax over GSIB capital rules

It’s not often that the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) finds its way onto the pages of Securities Finance Monitor, but this particular report caught our attention. The paper, called “Basel III capital surcharges for G-SIBs are far less effective in managing systemic risk in comparison to network-based, systemic risk-dependent financial transaction taxes” was published in the Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, hosted by the Department of Economics of the University of Missouri.

This content requires free registration (unlocked content) or a Finadium subscription. Log in or get access today by signing up here.

Related Posts

Previous Post
Is the failed Deutsche Boerse/London Stock Exchange merger good or bad for European repo? (Premium)
Next Post
ASIFMA report advocates for improved short selling rules in China

Related Posts

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

Menu
X

Reset password

Create an account