SEC’s Peirce suggests 3-year “safe harbor” regulation for crypto entrepreneurs

It is important to write rules that well-intentioned people can follow. When we see people struggling to find a way both to comply with the law and accomplish their laudable objectives, we need to ask ourselves whether the law should change to enable them to pursue their efforts in confidence that they are doing so legally, said Securities and Exchange commissioner Hester Peirce in a recent speech.

Entrepreneurs across the crypto landscape are facing adversity in their attempts to develop worthwhile and beneficial products. Whether it is issuing tokens to be used in a network, launching an exchange-traded product based on bitcoin, providing custody for crypto assets, operating a broker-dealer that handles crypto transactions, or setting up an alternative trading system where people can trade crypto assets, our securities laws stand in the way of innovation.

US regulators have created a regulatory Catch 22. Would-be networks cannot get their tokens out into people’s hands because their tokens are potentially subject to the securities laws. However, would-be networks cannot mature into a functional or decentralized network that is not dependent upon a single person or group to carry out the essential managerial or entrepreneurial efforts unless the tokens are distributed to and freely transferable among potential users, developers, and participants of the network. The securities laws cannot be ignored, but neither can we as securities regulators ignore the conundrum our laws create.

A way to address the uncertainty of the application of the securities laws to tokens is a concept Peirce laid out: “the safe harbor”, which protects token purchasers by requiring disclosures tailored to their needs, preserving the application of the antifraud provisions of the securities laws, and giving them an ability to participate in networks of interest to them. The safe harbor also provides network entrepreneurs sufficient time – a 3-year grace period – to build their networks before having to measure themselves against a decentralization or functionality yardstick, given certain conditions.

Read the full speech

Related Posts

Previous Post
BofE Working Paper: Bank funding costs and solvency
Next Post
Would we leave AWS for a Goldman Sachs financial cloud? Well… yes. (Premium)

Related Posts

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.


Reset password

Create an account